Meer informatie

Ga naar: navigatie, zoeken


  1. Het Digital Preservation Handbook van de Digital Preservation Coalition is een goede ingang 
  2. Beagrie, N et al: Digital Preservation Policy Study, 2008 
  3. An overview of published preservation policies used for this Catalogue can be found at 
  4. The National Archives: Digital Preservation Policies: Guidance for Archives, 2011 |

  5. D24.1 Report on Authenticity and Plan for Interoperable Authenticity Evaluation System, APARSEN project

    Bit Preservation
  6. E.M.Olmütz Zierau: A Holistic Approach to Bit Preservation. Thesis 2011, Hvidovre
  7. Bit Preservation: A Solved Problem?” by David S. H. Rosenthal, International Journal of Digital Curation Vol 5, No 1, 2010
  8. NDSA levels of preservation:
  9. Persistent Identifiers Interoperability Framework, APARSEN project|

    Functionele Preservering
  10. The Parliamentary Archives Digital Preservation Policy,
  11. Article on Danish website on Functional preservatiom, (in Danish)
  12. Definition of functional preservation:
  13. TRAC,

    Het digitale object
  14. Disposal policy of IK National Archives
  15. DPC Technology Watch Report 12-02 Charlesworth A:
    Intellectual Property Rights and Preservation [PDF 1187KB ]|

  16. METS standard,
  17. Metadata standards at DCC,
  18. Premis Data Dictionary version 2.1
  19. DPC Tech Watch report
  20. Article on metadata on Danish website (in Danish)
  21. Jenn Riley, Poster:
  22. Jenn Riley, Dictionary:
  23. Gartner, Richard: Metadata for digital libraries: state of the art and future directions, JISC Technology & Standards Watch, version 1.0, April 2008,
  24. Technology Watch Report 13-3:
    [1]Preservation Metadata (2nd edition) [986KB ]by Richard Gartner and Brian Lavoie (See also First Edition, (05-01 2005)). New DPC report
  25. Significant properties:
  26. (in Danish)
  27. Colin Webb, David Pearson, Paul Koerbin ( National Library of Australia). D-Lib, vol 19, issue 1-2.
    'Oh, you wanted us to preserve that?!' Statements of Preservation Intent for the National Library of Australia's Digital Collections.
  28. 5/january2013-webbhttp://dx.doi:10.104

  29. See APARSEN project: D31.1 Report on DRM preservation (to be available soon)
  30. For rights management metadata ODRL (Open Digital Rights Language) can be a useful standard,
  31. For technical metadata e.g. the standard MIX (for images) could be used,    
  32. Farell, T. ; Kim, Y. ; Pinsent, E. ; Kopidaki, S. ; Rynning, M. ; Manolopoulos, I. ; Papadopoulou, O. ; Arampatzis, S. ; Trochidis, I. ; Zioga, D:  BlogForever D3.3: Development of the Digital Rights Management Policy, 2013|

  33. A good overview of standards currently in use can be found at ” source: Aligning national approaches in Digital Preservation , 2012

  34. The APARSEN project has a work package related to Digital Rights Management (later update) and their results will be a good source.
  35. The CASPAR project Report on OAIS Access Model|

  36. Staffing: The Digital Curator Vocational Education Europe Project DigCurV project
  37. Costs:
  38. Creating a business case for digital preservation is described in the DPC Business Case
  39. Risks Drambora information, see

    Audit en Certificering
  40. Audit and certification of trustworthy digital repositories
    (ISO 16363)
  41. Data Seal of Approval
  42. Nestor Seal for Trustworthy Respositories based on DIN 31644 Criteria for trustworthy digital archives,
    DIN 31644
  43. See the website of the Primary Trustworthy Digital Repository Authorisation Body (PTAB) where information can be found how to prepare for an audit